With maritime transport playing a fundamental role in Malta’s Vision for 2050 and in line with the industry’s importance for trade, energy security and supply chains, the Forum emphasised the need for timely action on key priorities.

The Forum’s proposals focus mainly on:
Strengthening critical port infrastructure and operational resilience.
Supporting maritime decarbonisation, cleaner fuels and digitalisation.
Investing in maritime skills, professional certification and cadetship opportunities.
Improving standards and coordination to ensure the effective implementation of the National Maritime Transport Strategy.
Promoting more sustainable cargo transport and strengthening Malta’s position as an international maritime centre.

The MMF stressed that these priorities require clear implementation plans, defined responsibilities, realistic deadlines and appropriate resources to translate national ambitions into tangible results.

As part of the presentation, the Forum reaffirmed its readiness to contribute its industry expertise and work constructively with Government and relevant stakeholders towards the effective implementation of these proposals.

Minister Chris Bonett was accompanied to this meeting by Permanent Secretary Bjorn Callus, and key TM officials, namely Leonid McKay (CEO), Dr Ivan Tabone (Registrar General of Shipping and Seamen), Karen Zerafa (COO).

The post Malta Maritime Forum presents 2027 Pre-Budget Proposals to Minister Chris Bonett appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

A comprehensive presentation of the Forum’s evolving position was led by Chairman, Godwin Xerri and Vice Chairman, Alex Montebello.  They maintained that the Forum’s consistently supported decarbonisation and the objectives of EU ETS. Nevertheless, they showed how, in line with their warnings ahead of its enactment, the application caused serious competition distortions and leakages with disproportionate risks on Malta and other member states.  These risks compromise fair competition, solidarity and other fundamental EU principles.

The Forum showed how EU ETS on maritime was not achieving its climate change objectives because ships still traversed the same sea but were increasingly diverting their transhipment operations away from the EU ports instead.  Besides this carbon and business leakage, the Directive was also diverting investment in new transhipment ports outside of the Union.

In the context of Malta’s dependence on global maritime connectivity, the presentation clearly outlined the risks of loss of mainline services with direct effects on the whole of the economy including connected feeder services, towage, pilotage, port services, terminal operations, stevedoring, mooring, ship agency, legal services, bunkering, importation of raw materials and supplies, and the manufacturing industry.  Loss of connectivity can cause the relocation of certain industry away from Malta due to market proximity considerations and limitations of export channels causing loss of jobs, investment and balance of payments imbalance for the country.

The post MALTA MARITIME FORUM TAKES ITS EU ETS POSITION TO PARLIAMENT appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

A comprehensive presentation of the Forum’s evolving position was led by Chairman, Godwin Xerri and Vice Chairman, Alex Montebello. They maintained that the Forum’s consistently supported decarbonisation and the objectives of EU ETS. Nevertheless, they showed how, in line with their warnings ahead of its enactment, the application caused serious competition distortions and leakages with disproportionate risks on Malta and other member states. These risks compromise fair competition, solidarity and other fundamental EU principles.

The Forum showed how EU ETS on maritime was not achieving its climate change objectives because ships still traversed the same sea but were increasingly diverting their transhipment operations away from the EU ports instead. Besides this carbon and business leakage, the Directive was also diverting investment in new transhipment ports outside of the Union.

In the context of Malta’s dependence on global maritime connectivity, the presentation clearly outlined the risks of loss of mainline services with direct effects on the whole of the economy including connected feeder services, towage, pilotage, port services, terminal operations, stevedoring, mooring, ship agency, legal services, bunkering, importation of raw materials and supplies, and the manufacturing industry. Loss of connectivity can cause the relocation of certain industry away from Malta due to market proximity considerations and limitations of export channels causing loss of jobs, investment and balance of payments imbalance for the country.

The post MALTA MARITIME FORUM TAKES ITS EU ETS POSITION TO PARLIAMENT appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

The Chair of the Forum’s Sub-Committee, Mr Malcolm Custo’ explained that as an Island, Malta’s economy depends strongly on efficient and reliable maritime infrastructure and unfortunately, this fact is often overlooked.

The Grand Harbour supports a wide range of maritime activities that have developed over decades. These include cargo handling, cruise-passenger terminal facilities, ferry services, ship repair, fuel logistics and offshore support operations. In the context of the proposed Grand Harbour Revival Project, the Sub-Committee members expressed their view that they agreed in principle with the proposed Revival Plan for Valletta port subject to the conclusions of Independent navigational and safety risk assessments which are needed to determine and ascertain that the Grand Harbour can remain, first and foremost, a working port. To this end, they reiterated their position that if parts of the harbour need to be reorganised, alternative facilities must be ready before any relocation takes place. For this reason, and in light of current operational bottlenecks and limitations, the timeliness of the completion of the Ras Ħanżir project is of essence.

The Sub-Committee also gave its views on the latest EU ETS situation, insisting that special concessions needed to be given to transhipment ports located in island and island member states of the EU to preserve their competitiveness and protect them from unfair competition which has been leading to business, investment and carbon-leakage.

The post MMF Port Infrastructure Sub-Committee meets Shadow Ministers appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

Upon the publication of this much anticipated review, the Forum welcomed the continued focus on Europe’s decarbonisation ambitions in the proposals but cast serious doubts as to whether the revisions would be sufficient to ensure the long-term competitiveness of its ports and the wider maritime sector.

These concerns on the disruption of fair competitive conditions within the shipping and port sectors are more acute in the context of island Member States whose geographical realities have, once again, not been adequately reflected in the design of the reviewed System.

For Malta, this is not merely a question of competitiveness within the shipping and port sectors. Malta’s connectivity is a matter of economic security and social sustainability.  This point was made amply clear in the analysis of Prof Briguglio and his team.  It is most encouraging for the industry to learn that the arguments put forward consistently by the MMF are now supported academically.

Unlike continental Member States, Malta has no road, rail or inland waterway connection with the European continent.  Maritime transport is therefore the principal physical route through which consumer goods, medicines and other basic necessities enter and leave the country.  This dependence is further intensified by the fact that Malta does not produce most of the essential items it consumes and is not food self-sufficient.

The consequences of reduced maritime connectivity would therefore extend far beyond shipping.  They would affect households, businesses, manufacturers, tourism operators and the wider economy.

At the same time, the current design limitations of EU ETS Maritime continue to place Malta Freeport, like other EU transhipment ports in the Mediterranean, at a competitive disadvantage. Mainline container vessels are incentivised to use transhipment hubs outside the EU, including in nearby North Africa, where ETS applies differently or does not apply at all.  The potential savings can amount to millions of euros per service annually.

Since the onset of ETS, several mainliner services have been diverted away from EU ports.  North African facilities have absorbed the lion’s share of new transhipment business to the tune of 8m:0.5m TEUs (Containers – Twenty Equivalent Units).  New investment in the capacity of North African transhipment hubs has dwarfed that taking place in Europe.

If mainliners continue in their increasing trend to tranship elsewhere, calling at Malta solely to discharge or load the relatively small domestic component would not be economically justifiable.

Today, containers linked directly to Malta’s domestic market represent only around 4-5% of the containers transhipped through Malta Freeport.  The loss of the mainline calls that sustain the transhipment operation could therefore have consequences well beyond the Freeport itself.

Malta’s importers and exporters could lose direct connectivity with major global markets in Asia and the United States.  The manufacturing sector would also face increased costs and longer steaming times for importing raw materials and exporting finished products.  This is particularly significant for an economy that has no indigenous raw-material base and whose manufacturing industry produces predominantly for export markets.  Inputs used in the tourism industry would increase in cost rendering one of the Islands’ economic mainstays less competitive.   If Malta becomes more costly and less efficient to serve, the long-term viability of maintaining certain manufacturing and tourism operations on the island could be called into question.

Within the ETS review, the MMF noted the European Commission’s proposed measures intended to safeguard the connectivity of Europe’s most vulnerable regions.  These measures complement the Commission’s recent Communication on Islands and Coastal Communities, which the Forum also followed closely during the course of 2026.  The Forum noted that these measures are limited until 2031 and apply solely to islands that are part of larger member states.

This approach does not suffice for the MMF that has consistently argued that temporary, conditional or narrowly targeted measures cannot fully address a permanent geographical disadvantage.  The Forum therefore maintains that all islands, irrespective of size, together with outermost regions and island Member States, should benefit from a permanent and automatic derogation from ETS on the basis of their geographic disadvantage and insularity. A permanent disadvantage requires a permanent response.

The MMF also notes the Commission’s decision to amend the neighbouring port rule by lowering the relevant transhipment threshold from 65% to 50%.  While this may appear to strengthen the rule, it does not resolve a fundamental difficulty: competing ports in North Africa may not necessarily submit the data required for the threshold to be calculated.

Moreover, public statements by major container lines have made clear their objective of investing in North African terminals specifically for transhipment purposes.   Such facilities may remain outside the new 150-nautical-mile scope of the neighbouring port rule while nevertheless competing directly with EU Mediterranean ports.  This creates the risk of continuing and potentially increasing diversion of transhipment activity.

The Forum continues to emphasise that the neighbouring port rule is ineffective where a vessel simply does not call at an EU port as it traverses the Mediterranean.  Indeed, unless the broader structural imbalance is addressed, the current approach could create a further incentive for shipping companies to divert traffic away from EU ports altogether.

The Malta Maritime Forum is most appreciative of the Maltese Government for its direct involvement in this subject and of all the authorities and dignitaries, both locally and in Brussels, who have met the Forum and listened to its arguments and positions in advance of this review. Their engagement is important, but the process of consultation, analysis and review must continue relentlessly.

To this end, the MMF remains committed to advocating further reform of EU ETS Maritime, including explicit recognition of the particular circumstances of island Member States that depend on ro-ro maritime services as a principal link in their consumer and industrial supply chains. This position has been consistently advanced through the Forum’s numerous policy papers and recommendations.

The objective of decarbonisation must be pursued, but climate policy must also be designed in a manner that does not unintentionally isolate Europe’s islands, weaken their economic resilience or undermine the very connectivity on which their populations and industries depend. Socially sustainable maritime reform requires that Europe’s permanent geographical realities be recognised not as exceptions to be managed temporarily, but as structural conditions deserving permanent solutions.

In conclusion, as Prof. Briguglio argues, sustainable maritime reform must be not only greener but socially sustainable.  The Forum believes that besides socially sustainable, such reform must also serve the national interest.  Malta, as an island state, stands to be disproportionately affected by an ETS review that fails to adequately reflect its unique realities as an island Member State.

Godwin Xerri is the Chairman of the Malta Maritime Forum 

Source: The Malta Independent on Sunday, 30 August 2026

The post ETS review: Towards decarbonisation with connectivity and resilience appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

It was reported that the deal would also extend the ceasefire between the two nations, but challenges remain to ending the war. The deal’s details were not immediately released, but it appeared it would not be implemented until it is signed on Friday.

The war has had an impact on trade in the Gulf region and also on international oil prices. In Malta, fuel and energy prices have remained stable due to Government subsidies, which have been in place since the Covid-19 pandemic, but international oil prices had risen.

Chairman of the Malta Maritime Forum, Godwin Xerri, welcomed the news of the deal. “If the flow of fuel continues on its normal path, the first reaction should be a drop in the price of oil, which will be very positive,” he said.

He also mentioned the positive humanitarian perspective of such a agreement, saying that the seafarers who were stranded in the region would no longer be so.

As for the impact of the war on Malta, “there were some import and export industries affected in the country,” he said. “Hopefully negotiations will be successful and a permanent solution will be found.”

While services operating from the Freeport in Malta were not very negatively impacted to begin with, the opening of the Strait would be good news for the entire shipping industry, Alex Montebello, the CEO of Malta Freeport Terminals, told this newsroom.

“It will bring about an element of normality which we have been deprived of over the past few months in the region. For shipping in general it also means stability in oil prices, which is one of the main cost items for shipping. This augurs well for shipping at large,” he said.

Shipping sector operators also welcomed the news of the deal.

Kurt Camilleri, Managing Director of O&S Shipping Ltd, a Maltese company that provides freight, logistics and relocation services, said that freight costs skyrocketed as a result of surcharges and fuel prices emanating from the war.

The news of the initial deal, he said, means that if the Strait of Hormuz is reopened fuel from the Gulf to the rest of the world will resume as normal. He expects the market to settle, prices to go down, and some trade to pick up after the Strait is opened. “Hopefully it will be back to business as usual.”

Karl Gollcher, an Executive Director at the Gollcher Group, a transportation, logistics, supply chain and storage company, said that if the deal is signed it would help tremendously on the economic side of the shipping industry. Many owners who have ships locked in the Strait would be relieved, he said, adding that if it opens, goods, especially fuel, would move freely affecting market prices.

He hopes that it would be a long-term agreement that holds.

Thomas Sullivan, Commercial Director at Seatrans Shipping Ltd, a multifaceted maritime service organization, said that aside from easing world oil supply prices, a deal would also mean that vessels might start using the Suez Canal again.

“For local market and service providers, this will mean an increase in maritime activity,” Mr Sullivan said. He said operators would likely wait a while to ensure things settle down before doing so.

If that happens, prices will also drop, as instead of vessels going around the Cape of Good Hope, spending 10-12 days extra which increases costs, they would pass through the Suez Canal, he explained.

The post Malta’s maritime sector operators welcome US-Iran deal news, expect oil prices to settle if successful appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

MMF Electoral Proposals 2026

The post Proposals for a Maritime-Centred Electoral Manifesto appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

The post MMF’s Position on the Grand Harbour Revival Plan appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

A delegation of the Malta Maritime Forum (MMF) travelled to Brussels to discuss the EU’s Emission Trading System with the EU Institutions, Industry Associations and Maltese policy interlocutors.   The visit was intended to influence the forthcoming review of the Directive expected in July and served to :

1. present data on the negative repercussions of ETS in terms of business and carbon leakage and
2. to discuss possible alternatives to the implementation of ETS, the principles of which the Forum regards commendable.

To this end, meetings were held with the:

• European Commissioner Glenn Micallef and Head of Cabinet
• European Commission DG Clima EU ETS Head of Unit and Staff
• Deputy Permanent Representative to the EU and Maritime Attache
• European Tug Owners Association
• European Maritime Pilots Association
• European Sea Ports Organisation
• Federation of European Private Port Companies and Terminals
• European Parliament President Main Policy Advisor
• Malta’s MEPs Peter Agius, Alex Agius Saliba, Thomas Bajada, Daniel Attard and representatives from the offices of David Casa and EP President Roberta Metsola.

Whilst in Brussels the Forum sounding the alarm over the failings of EU ETS, arguing that it is failing spectacularly to achieve its commendable climate change green objectives because it is unable to enforce its Directive outside its jurisdiction.  As a result, transhipment business is largely shifting to new and expanded transhipment hubs that have mushroomed along the coast of North Africa to capture the business of cargo carriers that are re-routing away from EU ports to avoid ETS requirements with the risk of reducing southern EU ports to feeder hubs playing a secondary role to extra-EU ports where global cargo will become principally transhipped.

This effect runs diametrically counter to the objectives of the Commission’s new Port Strategy which was published while the MMF was holding its talks in Brussels and producing concrete evidence that EU ports were losing rather than gaining competitiveness yet the same amount of carbon was being generated in EU waters.  Hard facts were produced on the substantial growth being registered in non-EU ports at the expense of EU transhipment hubs. This shift has led to increased feeder traffic, paradoxically boosting overall emissions rather than curbing them.

This mounting practice is creating disproportionate economic risks for small island state economies like Malta’s which rely heavily on global maritime carriers to generate jobs and export-led growth. With high ETS costs and a relatively minute domestic container volume, the island risks losing direct calls from major shipping lines. If cargo bound for Malta is unloaded at neighbouring non-EU ports, Malta’s connectivity and competitiveness are undermined, jeopardising sectors such as manufacturing and logistics.

During its active interactions in Brussels, the Forum recommended that the European Commission:

• Adopts a temporary freeze on EU ETS and FuelEU for maritime transport until the establishment of a global decarbonisation measure
• Gives clear and concrete assurances to the industry that it would withdraw its ETS and FuelEU regimes once a global system is in place
• Extends derogations for small islands to major islands and prolong the sunset clause until 2035
• Exclude EU transhipment ports—where transhipment exceeds 65% of total activity—from the definition of “port of call” under the ETS Directive.
• Exclude short sea shipping from the scope of EU ETS until road transport ETS2 is operational.
• Introduce a risk assessment mechanism for ETS monitoring, applying predictive criteria to ensure fair oversight.

The Malta Maritime Forum is most appreciative of all Maltese MEPs for their unequivocal non-partisan approach in this matter and for attending in full force for the MMF presentation.  It also thanks EP President Dr Roberta Metsola and Commissioner Glenn Micallef for their support.

Buoyed by this positive feedback and support, the Forum plans to keep up its advocacy momentum with further visits in the coming weeks with a view to continue to urge EU policymakers to heed these recommendations and bring about a level playing field for all EU ports, thereby promoting an effective, sustainable and globally coordinated decarbonisation process in the maritime sector.

The MMF delegation consisted of Godwin Xerri, Chairman; Alex Montebello, Vice Chairman; Claudia Vella Casagrande, Director; and Kevin J Borg, CEO.

The post MMF UNDERLINES UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF EU ETS IN BRUSSELS – PRESENTS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FAIRER MARITIME DECARBONISATION appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.

The meeting was held shortly after the Forum’s announced commissioning of a second study about the Economic Contribution of the Maritime Industry which announcement was praised by Hon Dr Borg.  The MMF Chairman, Mr Godwin Xerri explained how this second study builds on the previous report and how it complements the forthcoming National Maritime Transport Strategy to which the MMF also contributed actively.

During the exchange of views, in fact, the Opposition and the Forum agreed on the potential for growth in the Industry beyond ship registration, cruise-liner operations and transhipment.  The meeting discussed areas that are ripe for further development and growth including ship finance, bunkering of new fuels and the establishment of a regional logistics hub, all of which were recommended in the Forum’s recent 2026 Budget Proposals position paper.

The meeting also served to discuss current issues of prime mutual interest which are acting as bottlenecks to future growth including international regulation, infrastructural limitations and an acute shortage of workers.

To this end, the meeting underlined the role of education and talent in ensuring further success for the industry.  The MMF explained that as a matter of priority, it was consistently pressing for increased exposure of maritime careers and better coordination between the relevant stakeholders in this regard.

The Leader of the Opposition reaffirmed his Party’s belief that the maritime industry remains one of the most important for the Maltese economy and every initiative aimed at strengthening its competitiveness, employment and long-term resilience is a significant step forward.  He reiterated the Opposition’s firm intentions to establish a dedicated maritime authority and a Minister for maritime affairs if elected to govern.

The post Future Challenges and Opportunities for the Maritime Industry discussed with the Leader of the Opposition appeared first on Malta Maritime Forum.